A cat forum. CatBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » CatBanter forum » Cat Newsgroups » Cat health & behaviour
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

chocolate poisoning q



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old March 10th 04, 05:03 AM
Dennis Carr
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default chocolate poisoning q

My wife recently told me of a cat she once had who would share chocolate
pudding with her. And survived.

Yes, weird. But I bring this up because I feel there is a question here.
It is, besides, indirectly linked to how she learned (the hard way) about
chocolate poisoning.

It's widely grokked that chocolate in more than the minutest amount is
fatal to cats (I believe it's the theophylline in it), but is anyone else
aware of why a cat would not be susceptible to this kind of poisoning, or
if there are other cases?

--
Dennis Carr - | I may be out of my mind,
http://www.dennis.furtopia.org | But I have more fun that way.
------------------------------------+-------------------------------

  #2  
Old March 10th 04, 05:11 AM
Cathy Friedmann
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Dennis Carr" wrote in message
news
My wife recently told me of a cat she once had who would share chocolate
pudding with her. And survived.

Yes, weird. But I bring this up because I feel there is a question here.
It is, besides, indirectly linked to how she learned (the hard way) about
chocolate poisoning.

It's widely grokked that chocolate in more than the minutest amount is
fatal to cats (I believe it's the theophylline in it), but is anyone else
aware of why a cat would not be susceptible to this kind of poisoning, or
if there are other cases?


The chemical in chocolate that's toxic to cats (& dogs) is theobromine.
Milk chocolate contains the least amount of the chemical, dark chocolate
more, & bitter/baking chocolate contains the most.

Although I personally wouldn't feed it to my cats, minute amounts of milk
chocolate are not likely to cause any symptoms. Since pudding may have milk
chocolate in it - or maybe even chocolate flavoring Vs. real chocolate? - &
in small amounts, that's probably the explanation.

In one of Peter Gethers' books about his (late) cat Norton, he told of a
restaurant owner who set a dish of chocolate ice cream out for Norton on a
fairly regular basis, yet Norton never showed any ill effects. The amount
of theobromine that was in each serving was obviously not enough to have an
effect.

Larger amounts, esp. of darker chocolate can prove to be toxic, incl. fatal,
though.

Cathy

--
"Staccato signals of constant information..."
("The Boy in the Bubble") Paul Simon



  #3  
Old March 10th 04, 05:11 AM
Cathy Friedmann
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Dennis Carr" wrote in message
news
My wife recently told me of a cat she once had who would share chocolate
pudding with her. And survived.

Yes, weird. But I bring this up because I feel there is a question here.
It is, besides, indirectly linked to how she learned (the hard way) about
chocolate poisoning.

It's widely grokked that chocolate in more than the minutest amount is
fatal to cats (I believe it's the theophylline in it), but is anyone else
aware of why a cat would not be susceptible to this kind of poisoning, or
if there are other cases?


The chemical in chocolate that's toxic to cats (& dogs) is theobromine.
Milk chocolate contains the least amount of the chemical, dark chocolate
more, & bitter/baking chocolate contains the most.

Although I personally wouldn't feed it to my cats, minute amounts of milk
chocolate are not likely to cause any symptoms. Since pudding may have milk
chocolate in it - or maybe even chocolate flavoring Vs. real chocolate? - &
in small amounts, that's probably the explanation.

In one of Peter Gethers' books about his (late) cat Norton, he told of a
restaurant owner who set a dish of chocolate ice cream out for Norton on a
fairly regular basis, yet Norton never showed any ill effects. The amount
of theobromine that was in each serving was obviously not enough to have an
effect.

Larger amounts, esp. of darker chocolate can prove to be toxic, incl. fatal,
though.

Cathy

--
"Staccato signals of constant information..."
("The Boy in the Bubble") Paul Simon



  #4  
Old March 10th 04, 09:07 AM
Phil P.
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Dennis Carr" wrote in message
news
My wife recently told me of a cat she once had who would share chocolate
pudding with her. And survived.

Yes, weird. But I bring this up because I feel there is a question here.
It is, besides, indirectly linked to how she learned (the hard way) about
chocolate poisoning.

It's widely grokked that chocolate in more than the minutest amount is
fatal to cats


The acute lethal dosage of theobromine in cats is ~80-150 mg/kg. That
translates into ~320-600 mg for an average 4 kg (8.8 lb) cat. A cat would
have to eat at least one ounce of baking chocolate or 8-10 ounces of milk
chocolate to ingest a toxic dose.

Baking chocolate contains ~400 mg/oz of theobromine;
Dark chocolate: ~130-150 mg/oz;
Semisweet chocolate: ~140 mg/oz
Milk chocolate: ~40-60 mg/oz;
White chocolate: ~0.25 mg/oz

(I believe it's the theophylline in it),


The toxic ingredient in chocolate is theobromine - not theophylline.
Theophylline is in the same family (methylxanthine) as theobromine and is
also toxic to cats at higher doses than theobromine. Theophylline is used
at low dosages as a very effective bronchodilator in cats with bronchitis
and asthma.

Chocolate also contains caffine (in lesser amounts than theobromine), which
is also a methylxanthine and toxic to cats.

If I were you, I wouldn't feed chocolate to my cat. There are plenty of
other treats you can give a cat that she would enjoy much more.

Phil





  #5  
Old March 10th 04, 09:07 AM
Phil P.
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Dennis Carr" wrote in message
news
My wife recently told me of a cat she once had who would share chocolate
pudding with her. And survived.

Yes, weird. But I bring this up because I feel there is a question here.
It is, besides, indirectly linked to how she learned (the hard way) about
chocolate poisoning.

It's widely grokked that chocolate in more than the minutest amount is
fatal to cats


The acute lethal dosage of theobromine in cats is ~80-150 mg/kg. That
translates into ~320-600 mg for an average 4 kg (8.8 lb) cat. A cat would
have to eat at least one ounce of baking chocolate or 8-10 ounces of milk
chocolate to ingest a toxic dose.

Baking chocolate contains ~400 mg/oz of theobromine;
Dark chocolate: ~130-150 mg/oz;
Semisweet chocolate: ~140 mg/oz
Milk chocolate: ~40-60 mg/oz;
White chocolate: ~0.25 mg/oz

(I believe it's the theophylline in it),


The toxic ingredient in chocolate is theobromine - not theophylline.
Theophylline is in the same family (methylxanthine) as theobromine and is
also toxic to cats at higher doses than theobromine. Theophylline is used
at low dosages as a very effective bronchodilator in cats with bronchitis
and asthma.

Chocolate also contains caffine (in lesser amounts than theobromine), which
is also a methylxanthine and toxic to cats.

If I were you, I wouldn't feed chocolate to my cat. There are plenty of
other treats you can give a cat that she would enjoy much more.

Phil





  #6  
Old March 10th 04, 11:07 PM
Steve G
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Dennis Carr wrote in message . ..
(...)

It's widely grokked that chocolate in more than the minutest amount is
fatal to cats (I believe it's the theophylline in it), but is anyone else
aware of why a cat would not be susceptible to this kind of poisoning, or
if there are other cases?


A trivial addition to the other replies - theophylline is a component
of tea, so if your cat drinks the odd cuppa, only then might you be
interested in that ingredient...!

Steve.
  #7  
Old March 10th 04, 11:07 PM
Steve G
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Dennis Carr wrote in message . ..
(...)

It's widely grokked that chocolate in more than the minutest amount is
fatal to cats (I believe it's the theophylline in it), but is anyone else
aware of why a cat would not be susceptible to this kind of poisoning, or
if there are other cases?


A trivial addition to the other replies - theophylline is a component
of tea, so if your cat drinks the odd cuppa, only then might you be
interested in that ingredient...!

Steve.
  #8  
Old March 11th 04, 10:03 AM
IBen Getiner
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Dennis Carr wrote in message . ..
My wife recently told me of a cat she once had who would share chocolate
pudding with her. And survived.

Yes, weird. But I bring this up because I feel there is a question here.
It is, besides, indirectly linked to how she learned (the hard way) about
chocolate poisoning.

It's widely grokked that chocolate in more than the minutest amount is
fatal to cats (I believe it's the theophylline in it), but is anyone else
aware of why a cat would not be susceptible to this kind of poisoning, or
if there are other cases?


You are typical of today's push-button knee-jerk liberal liars. You
just won't rest until you've stirred everybody and everything up and
you've PCed everything in your path. You're the same stupid idiots who
tell us not to feed our cats fish or not to give them milk. You are
also the same ones who are telling us now that it's all right for a
man to marry another man. All quite natural, you see. You just can't
wait to reshape society in your own narcissistic image.
Don't come in here with your PC trash again. I will be watching out
for you and you will be constantly and immediately rebutted to the
highest degree. Not everyone is a Jerry Springer Pro wrestling sitcom
loving zombie, prickweed. We won't quit giving our pets treats anymore
than we could be duped into voting for Hillary Clinton. We know who
you are and we know what you do. Keep away.



IBen
  #9  
Old March 11th 04, 10:03 AM
IBen Getiner
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Dennis Carr wrote in message . ..
My wife recently told me of a cat she once had who would share chocolate
pudding with her. And survived.

Yes, weird. But I bring this up because I feel there is a question here.
It is, besides, indirectly linked to how she learned (the hard way) about
chocolate poisoning.

It's widely grokked that chocolate in more than the minutest amount is
fatal to cats (I believe it's the theophylline in it), but is anyone else
aware of why a cat would not be susceptible to this kind of poisoning, or
if there are other cases?


You are typical of today's push-button knee-jerk liberal liars. You
just won't rest until you've stirred everybody and everything up and
you've PCed everything in your path. You're the same stupid idiots who
tell us not to feed our cats fish or not to give them milk. You are
also the same ones who are telling us now that it's all right for a
man to marry another man. All quite natural, you see. You just can't
wait to reshape society in your own narcissistic image.
Don't come in here with your PC trash again. I will be watching out
for you and you will be constantly and immediately rebutted to the
highest degree. Not everyone is a Jerry Springer Pro wrestling sitcom
loving zombie, prickweed. We won't quit giving our pets treats anymore
than we could be duped into voting for Hillary Clinton. We know who
you are and we know what you do. Keep away.



IBen
  #10  
Old March 11th 04, 10:29 AM
Jeannie
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"IBen Getiner" wrote in message
om...
Dennis Carr wrote in message

. ..
My wife recently told me of a cat she once had who would share chocolate
pudding with her. And survived.

Yes, weird. But I bring this up because I feel there is a question

here.
It is, besides, indirectly linked to how she learned (the hard way)

about
chocolate poisoning.

It's widely grokked that chocolate in more than the minutest amount is
fatal to cats (I believe it's the theophylline in it), but is anyone

else
aware of why a cat would not be susceptible to this kind of poisoning,

or
if there are other cases?


You are typical of today's push-button knee-jerk liberal liars. You
just won't rest until you've stirred everybody and everything up and
you've PCed everything in your path. You're the same stupid idiots who
tell us not to feed our cats fish or not to give them milk. You are
also the same ones who are telling us now that it's all right for a
man to marry another man. All quite natural, you see. You just can't
wait to reshape society in your own narcissistic image.
Don't come in here with your PC trash again. I will be watching out
for you and you will be constantly and immediately rebutted to the
highest degree. Not everyone is a Jerry Springer Pro wrestling sitcom
loving zombie, prickweed. We won't quit giving our pets treats anymore
than we could be duped into voting for Hillary Clinton. We know who
you are and we know what you do. Keep away.



IBen


Hilary Clinton....Jerry Springer...homosexual marriages....What the hell was
that all about?

Jeannie



 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
rec.pets.cats: Ocicats Breed-FAQ Michael and Laura Raybaud Cat Information 0 October 29th 04 05:25 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:18 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 CatBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.