If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
What's in pet food?
On Wed, 15 Jun 2011 10:47:36 -0400, Char wrote:
On 6/13/2011 3:39 PM, dh@. wrote: On Sat, 11 Jun 2011 21:09:16 -0400, wrote: On 6/9/2011 10:10 PM, AT DOT Gandalf wrote: On Thu, 09 Jun 2011 12:26:17 -0700, Rudy Canoza wrote: Goo would like us to believe that what's on the label is what's in the can, because that's what he believes. Goo apparently thinks herds and flocks of livestock animals are raised for no other reason than to be used for pet food: "It's established: cattle and other animals are expressly raised to be pet food." - Goo "Cattle are specifically bred into existence to be pet food. There have been several citations to support this." - Goo and so believes labels saying things like the following really do represent what's inside: cheeseburger, turkey and bacon, lamb and rice, roasted turkey medley, porterhouse steak, smoked bacon and egg, top sirloin, rib-eye steak, steak florentine, oven roasted beef burgundy, steak tips sonoma, roast turkey, new york strip, filet mignon The poor Goober is still somewhat confused though, even though he feels certain animals are raised only to become pet food, he's very VERY much afraid to say what he thinks happens to the choice cuts of meat. We've narrowed it down to him pretty much having to believe they are used in pet food and the labels on the cans accurately represent what's inside. But why is Goo so afraid to say that's what he believes? After considering it for a while I've come to the conclusion that Goo's poor little brain is disturbed because it can't figure out why rib-eye for dogs is so much cheaper than it is for humans, and he also can't figure out why a can of rib-eye dog food isn't several times more expensive than a can of cheeseburger dog food, etc. LOL!!! Another GOD DAMNED Usenet TROLL. Please DO NOT FEED THIS CROSS POSTING TROLL!!!! You can start by not cross posting it. Duh! There's nothing wrong with cross posting. There is something wrong with cross posting troll posts. You don't appreciate the significance. Some eliminationists like to believe that animals live and die ONLY to become pet food, meaning that more animals experience life because of it which is incorrect. Even so they believe it and so they are opposed to it. Goo believed that some cattle are raised for twelve years for no other reason than to become pet food. If there are any other people that clueless, they should learn the truth already. |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
What's in pet food?
On 6/16/2011 6:42 PM, dh@. wrote:
On Wed, 15 Jun 2011 10:47:36 -0400, wrote: On 6/13/2011 3:39 PM, dh@. wrote: On Sat, 11 Jun 2011 21:09:16 -0400, wrote: On 6/9/2011 10:10 PM, AT DOT Gandalf wrote: On Thu, 09 Jun 2011 12:26:17 -0700, Rudy Canoza wrote: Goo would like us to believe that what's on the label is what's in the can, because that's what he believes. Goo apparently thinks herds and flocks of livestock animals are raised for no other reason than to be used for pet food: "It's established: cattle and other animals are expressly raised to be pet food." - Goo "Cattle are specifically bred into existence to be pet food. There have been several citations to support this." - Goo and so believes labels saying things like the following really do represent what's inside: cheeseburger, turkey and bacon, lamb and rice, roasted turkey medley, porterhouse steak, smoked bacon and egg, top sirloin, rib-eye steak, steak florentine, oven roasted beef burgundy, steak tips sonoma, roast turkey, new york strip, filet mignon The poor Goober is still somewhat confused though, even though he feels certain animals are raised only to become pet food, he's very VERY much afraid to say what he thinks happens to the choice cuts of meat. We've narrowed it down to him pretty much having to believe they are used in pet food and the labels on the cans accurately represent what's inside. But why is Goo so afraid to say that's what he believes? After considering it for a while I've come to the conclusion that Goo's poor little brain is disturbed because it can't figure out why rib-eye for dogs is so much cheaper than it is for humans, and he also can't figure out why a can of rib-eye dog food isn't several times more expensive than a can of cheeseburger dog food, etc. LOL!!! Another GOD DAMNED Usenet TROLL. Please DO NOT FEED THIS CROSS POSTING TROLL!!!! You can start by not cross posting it. Duh! There's nothing wrong with cross posting. There is something wrong with cross posting troll posts. You don't appreciate the significance. Some eliminationists like to believe that animals live and die ONLY to become pet food, meaning that more animals experience life because of it which is incorrect. Even so they believe it and so they are opposed to it. There is no commercial pet food company anywhere that does that. Dog food is almost always made from leftovers from human foods, and that will sometimes include sawdust, roadkill, pea hulls, beet pulp, and worse! However, even if it were true why would anyone oppose it? Goo believed that some cattle are raised for twelve years for no other reason than to become pet food. If there are any other people that clueless, they should learn the truth already. Animals used for food are used very young when they are tender. How could it be cost efficient to feed an animal for 12 years before you butcher it? Your average chicken in a supermarket is only 8-10 weeks old. Having said all that, all you and your friends are doing is repeating the same crap over and over again and not adding anything new to the debate so why do it? |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
What's in pet food?
On Jun 17, 6:28*am, Char wrote:
On 6/16/2011 6:42 PM, dh@. wrote: On Wed, 15 Jun 2011 10:47:36 -0400, *wrote: On 6/13/2011 3:39 PM, dh@. wrote: On Sat, 11 Jun 2011 21:09:16 -0400, * wrote: On 6/9/2011 10:10 PM, AT DOT Gandalf wrote: On Thu, 09 Jun 2011 12:26:17 -0700, Rudy Canoza * *wrote: * * * Goo would like us to believe that what's on the label is what's in the can, because that's what he believes. Goo apparently thinks herds and flocks of livestock animals are raised for no other reason than to be used for pet food: "It's established: *cattle and other animals are expressly raised to be pet food." - Goo "Cattle are specifically bred into existence to be pet food. *There have been several citations to support this." - Goo and so believes labels saying things like the following really do represent what's inside: cheeseburger, turkey and bacon, lamb and rice, roasted turkey medley, porterhouse steak, smoked bacon and egg, top sirloin, rib-eye steak, steak florentine, oven roasted beef burgundy, steak tips sonoma, roast turkey, new york strip, filet mignon The poor Goober is still somewhat confused though, even though he feels certain animals are raised only to become pet food, he's very VERY much afraid to say what he thinks happens to the choice cuts of meat. We've narrowed it down to him pretty much having to believe they are used in pet food and the labels on the cans accurately represent what's inside. But why is Goo so afraid to say that's what he believes? After considering it for a while I've come to the conclusion that Goo's poor little brain is disturbed because it can't figure out why rib-eye for dogs is so much cheaper than it is for humans, and he also can't figure out why a can of rib-eye dog food isn't several times more expensive than a can of cheeseburger dog food, etc. LOL!!! Another GOD DAMNED Usenet TROLL. Please DO NOT FEED THIS CROSS POSTING TROLL!!!! You can start by not cross posting it. Duh! * * * There's nothing wrong with cross posting. There is something wrong with cross posting troll posts. * * *You don't appreciate the significance. Some eliminationists like to believe that animals live and die ONLY to become pet food, meaning that more animals experience life because of it which is incorrect. Even so they believe it and so they are opposed to it. There is no commercial pet food company anywhere that does that. Dog food is almost always made from leftovers from human foods, and that will sometimes include sawdust, roadkill, pea hulls, beet pulp, and worse! However, even if it were true why would anyone oppose it? * Goo believed that some cattle are raised for twelve years for no other reason than to become pet food. If there are any other people that clueless, they should learn the truth already. Animals used for food are used very young when they are tender. How could it be cost efficient to feed an animal for 12 years before you butcher it? Your average chicken in a supermarket is only 8-10 weeks old. Having said all that, all you and your friends are doing is repeating the same crap over and over again and not adding anything new to the debate so why do it?- We've spent YEARS trying to convince Goobs that NO cows are being raised for 12 years for the singular purpose of becoming pet food. Why don't YOU try convincing him? (he's very stupid and an extremely slow learner) |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
What's in pet food?
"Char" wrote
Having said all that, all you and your friends are doing is repeating the same crap over and over again and not adding anything new to the debate so why do it? It's the broken record tactic. If he makes the same meaningless sound often enough he believes eventually someone will have to listen to him. He's also working on the "last word wins" theory. It's the result of a bankrupt mind. |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
What's in pet food?
On 6/17/2011 9:20 AM, Mr.Smartypants wrote:
On Jun 17, 6:28 am, wrote: On 6/16/2011 6:42 PM, dh@. wrote: On Wed, 15 Jun 2011 10:47:36 -0400, wrote: On 6/13/2011 3:39 PM, dh@. wrote: On Sat, 11 Jun 2011 21:09:16 -0400, wrote: On 6/9/2011 10:10 PM, AT DOT Gandalf wrote: On Thu, 09 Jun 2011 12:26:17 -0700, Rudy Canoza wrote: Goo would like us to believe that what's on the label is what's in the can, because that's what he believes. Goo apparently thinks herds and flocks of livestock animals are raised for no other reason than to be used for pet food: "It's established: cattle and other animals are expressly raised to be pet food." - Goo "Cattle are specifically bred into existence to be pet food. There have been several citations to support this." - Goo and so believes labels saying things like the following really do represent what's inside: cheeseburger, turkey and bacon, lamb and rice, roasted turkey medley, porterhouse steak, smoked bacon and egg, top sirloin, rib-eye steak, steak florentine, oven roasted beef burgundy, steak tips sonoma, roast turkey, new york strip, filet mignon The poor Goober is still somewhat confused though, even though he feels certain animals are raised only to become pet food, he's very VERY much afraid to say what he thinks happens to the choice cuts of meat. We've narrowed it down to him pretty much having to believe they are used in pet food and the labels on the cans accurately represent what's inside. But why is Goo so afraid to say that's what he believes? After considering it for a while I've come to the conclusion that Goo's poor little brain is disturbed because it can't figure out why rib-eye for dogs is so much cheaper than it is for humans, and he also can't figure out why a can of rib-eye dog food isn't several times more expensive than a can of cheeseburger dog food, etc. LOL!!! Another GOD DAMNED Usenet TROLL. Please DO NOT FEED THIS CROSS POSTING TROLL!!!! You can start by not cross posting it. Duh! There's nothing wrong with cross posting. There is something wrong with cross posting troll posts. You don't appreciate the significance. Some eliminationists like to believe that animals live and die ONLY to become pet food, meaning that more animals experience life because of it which is incorrect. Even so they believe it and so they are opposed to it. There is no commercial pet food company anywhere that does that. Dog food is almost always made from leftovers from human foods, and that will sometimes include sawdust, roadkill, pea hulls, beet pulp, and worse! However, even if it were true why would anyone oppose it? Goo believed that some cattle are raised for twelve years for no other reason than to become pet food. If there are any other people that clueless, they should learn the truth already. Animals used for food are used very young when they are tender. How could it be cost efficient to feed an animal for 12 years before you butcher it? Your average chicken in a supermarket is only 8-10 weeks old. Having said all that, all you and your friends are doing is repeating the same crap over and over again and not adding anything new to the debate so why do it?- We've spent YEARS trying to convince Goobs that NO cows are being raised for 12 years for the singular purpose of becoming pet food. Why don't YOU try convincing him? (he's very stupid and an extremely slow learner) I have a life, that's why. You should try it sometime. Why do you care what one person thinks? Does it really matter? All you are doing is feeding the troll. That's rather stupid. |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
What's in pet food?
On 6/17/2011 3:25 PM, Dutch wrote:
"Char" wrote Having said all that, all you and your friends are doing is repeating the same crap over and over again and not adding anything new to the debate so why do it? It's the broken record tactic. If he makes the same meaningless sound often enough he believes eventually someone will have to listen to him. He's also working on the "last word wins" theory. It's the result of a bankrupt mind. So what? Why is it important to worry so much about one person and one idea? Turn the computer off, go outside and get some fresh air. |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
What's in pet food?
"Char" wrote in message news On 6/17/2011 9:20 AM, Mr.Smartypants wrote: On Jun 17, 6:28 am, wrote: On 6/16/2011 6:42 PM, dh@. wrote: On Wed, 15 Jun 2011 10:47:36 -0400, wrote: On 6/13/2011 3:39 PM, dh@. wrote: On Sat, 11 Jun 2011 21:09:16 -0400, wrote: On 6/9/2011 10:10 PM, AT DOT Gandalf wrote: On Thu, 09 Jun 2011 12:26:17 -0700, Rudy Canoza wrote: Goo would like us to believe that what's on the label is what's in the can, because that's what he believes. Goo apparently thinks herds and flocks of livestock animals are raised for no other reason than to be used for pet food: "It's established: cattle and other animals are expressly raised to be pet food." - Goo "Cattle are specifically bred into existence to be pet food. There have been several citations to support this." - Goo and so believes labels saying things like the following really do represent what's inside: cheeseburger, turkey and bacon, lamb and rice, roasted turkey medley, porterhouse steak, smoked bacon and egg, top sirloin, rib-eye steak, steak florentine, oven roasted beef burgundy, steak tips sonoma, roast turkey, new york strip, filet mignon The poor Goober is still somewhat confused though, even though he feels certain animals are raised only to become pet food, he's very VERY much afraid to say what he thinks happens to the choice cuts of meat. We've narrowed it down to him pretty much having to believe they are used in pet food and the labels on the cans accurately represent what's inside. But why is Goo so afraid to say that's what he believes? After considering it for a while I've come to the conclusion that Goo's poor little brain is disturbed because it can't figure out why rib-eye for dogs is so much cheaper than it is for humans, and he also can't figure out why a can of rib-eye dog food isn't several times more expensive than a can of cheeseburger dog food, etc. LOL!!! Another GOD DAMNED Usenet TROLL. Please DO NOT FEED THIS CROSS POSTING TROLL!!!! You can start by not cross posting it. Duh! There's nothing wrong with cross posting. There is something wrong with cross posting troll posts. You don't appreciate the significance. Some eliminationists like to believe that animals live and die ONLY to become pet food, meaning that more animals experience life because of it which is incorrect. Even so they believe it and so they are opposed to it. There is no commercial pet food company anywhere that does that. Dog food is almost always made from leftovers from human foods, and that will sometimes include sawdust, roadkill, pea hulls, beet pulp, and worse! However, even if it were true why would anyone oppose it? Goo believed that some cattle are raised for twelve years for no other reason than to become pet food. If there are any other people that clueless, they should learn the truth already. Animals used for food are used very young when they are tender. How could it be cost efficient to feed an animal for 12 years before you butcher it? Your average chicken in a supermarket is only 8-10 weeks old. Having said all that, all you and your friends are doing is repeating the same crap over and over again and not adding anything new to the debate so why do it?- We've spent YEARS trying to convince Goobs that NO cows are being raised for 12 years for the singular purpose of becoming pet food. Why don't YOU try convincing him? (he's very stupid and an extremely slow learner) I have a life, that's why. You should try it sometime. Why do you care what one person thinks? Does it really matter? All you are doing is feeding the troll. That's rather stupid. He *is* the troll. |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
What's in pet food?
"Char" wrote in message
news On 6/17/2011 3:25 PM, Dutch wrote: "Char" wrote Having said all that, all you and your friends are doing is repeating the same crap over and over again and not adding anything new to the debate so why do it? It's the broken record tactic. If he makes the same meaningless sound often enough he believes eventually someone will have to listen to him. He's also working on the "last word wins" theory. It's the result of a bankrupt mind. So what? Why is it important to worry so much about one person and one idea? Turn the computer off, go outside and get some fresh air. Trying to be annoying to someone is the pinnacle of achievement for him, don't ask him to give that up! |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
What's in pet food?
On Jun 17, 7:27*pm, "Dutch" wrote:
"Char" wrote in message news On 6/17/2011 3:25 PM, Dutch wrote: "Char" wrote Having said all that, all you and your friends are doing is repeating the same crap over and over again and not adding anything new to the debate so why do it? It's the broken record tactic. If he makes the same meaningless sound often enough he believes eventually someone will have to listen to him.. He's also working on the "last word wins" theory. It's the result of a bankrupt mind. So what? Why is it important to worry so much about one person and one idea? Turn the computer off, go outside and get some fresh air. Trying to be annoying to someone is the pinnacle of achievement for him, don't ask him to give that up! While you two goos are on aaev trying to be annoying to *everyone*. Get Goo to answer Rupert's question if you want to be useful. |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
What's in pet food?
"Mr.Smartypants" wrote in message ... On Jun 17, 7:27 pm, "Dutch" wrote: "Char" wrote in message news On 6/17/2011 3:25 PM, Dutch wrote: "Char" wrote Having said all that, all you and your friends are doing is repeating the same crap over and over again and not adding anything new to the debate so why do it? It's the broken record tactic. If he makes the same meaningless sound often enough he believes eventually someone will have to listen to him. He's also working on the "last word wins" theory. It's the result of a bankrupt mind. So what? Why is it important to worry so much about one person and one idea? Turn the computer off, go outside and get some fresh air. Trying to be annoying to someone is the pinnacle of achievement for him, don't ask him to give that up! While - While I grow old waiting for you say anything sensible. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Kitten food for an 8 month old cat or switch to adult food? | mike | Cat health & behaviour | 3 | June 1st 09 12:12 AM |
Cat food brands--Science Diet = cat equivalent of rich folk buyingtheir people food at Whole Foods and other boutique grocery stores? | mike | Cat health & behaviour | 9 | April 22nd 09 02:05 PM |
Making dry food look/smell/taste like wet food | Ray Ban | Cat health & behaviour | 20 | October 29th 03 11:17 PM |