If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#371
|
|||
|
|||
"Brandy Alexandre" wrote Chicago is frustrating and often contradicts itself, but it's what "they" use. Exactly why I was forced to use it. --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.656 / Virus Database: 421 - Release Date: 4/9/2004 |
#372
|
|||
|
|||
"Cheryl" wrote in message ... "Ryan Robbins" dumped this in news:2Z2ec.5755 on 10 Apr 2004: "Cheryl" wrote in message ... Sentences don't start with "And". You're wrong on that one. They can also start with "but." There used to be a rule to the contrary. If things have changed, I don't approve. It doesn't "sound" right. -- Psst ... belts and shoes don't have to match now either. And .... it is perfectly acceptable to use the passive voice. Has been for a few years. Sentence fragments are still no-nos, though. --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.656 / Virus Database: 421 - Release Date: 4/10/2004 |
#373
|
|||
|
|||
"Cheryl" wrote in message ... "Ryan Robbins" dumped this in news:2Z2ec.5755 on 10 Apr 2004: "Cheryl" wrote in message ... Sentences don't start with "And". You're wrong on that one. They can also start with "but." There used to be a rule to the contrary. If things have changed, I don't approve. It doesn't "sound" right. -- Psst ... belts and shoes don't have to match now either. And .... it is perfectly acceptable to use the passive voice. Has been for a few years. Sentence fragments are still no-nos, though. --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.656 / Virus Database: 421 - Release Date: 4/10/2004 |
#374
|
|||
|
|||
"Mary" wrote in message m... it is perfectly acceptable to use the passive voice. However, one should use passive voice sparingly. Business people are notoriously bad when it comes to choosing when to use active voice and when to use passive voice. "It was decided to adjourn at 4:30 p.m." is weak. "We decided to adjourn at 4:30 p.m." is strong. Passive voice is acceptable in the following example: "The mayor was arrested on suspicion of operating a motor vehicle while under the influence last night." The mayor's arrest is the news because he's the mayor. But if the police arrest Joe Six-pack, "The police arrested a 36-year-old Boston man on suspicion of operating a motor vehicle while under the influence last night" is more appropriate because Six-pack's involvement isn't the news. |
#375
|
|||
|
|||
"Mary" wrote in message m... it is perfectly acceptable to use the passive voice. However, one should use passive voice sparingly. Business people are notoriously bad when it comes to choosing when to use active voice and when to use passive voice. "It was decided to adjourn at 4:30 p.m." is weak. "We decided to adjourn at 4:30 p.m." is strong. Passive voice is acceptable in the following example: "The mayor was arrested on suspicion of operating a motor vehicle while under the influence last night." The mayor's arrest is the news because he's the mayor. But if the police arrest Joe Six-pack, "The police arrested a 36-year-old Boston man on suspicion of operating a motor vehicle while under the influence last night" is more appropriate because Six-pack's involvement isn't the news. |
#376
|
|||
|
|||
it is perfectly acceptable to use the passive voice.
Has been for a few years. Sentence fragments are still no-nos, though. Psssttt.... as is ending a sentence with a preposition. Although there are ways around it, I suppose. I still remember a kid in high school who got around it by ending every sentence with "now." Of course this is the same kid who prounounced hors douvres (SP?) as "horse doovers." Sherry |
#377
|
|||
|
|||
it is perfectly acceptable to use the passive voice.
Has been for a few years. Sentence fragments are still no-nos, though. Psssttt.... as is ending a sentence with a preposition. Although there are ways around it, I suppose. I still remember a kid in high school who got around it by ending every sentence with "now." Of course this is the same kid who prounounced hors douvres (SP?) as "horse doovers." Sherry |
#378
|
|||
|
|||
"Sherry " wrote in message ... it is perfectly acceptable to use the passive voice. Has been for a few years. Sentence fragments are still no-nos, though. Psssttt.... as is ending a sentence with a preposition. Although there are ways around it, I suppose. I still remember a kid in high school who got around it by ending every sentence with "now." Of course this is the same kid who prounounced hors douvres (SP?) as "horse doovers." Have you ever read Bill Bryson, & his takes on the use of the English language? He suggests that we forget about the old dangling prepositions rule, & let them dangle all we want to. ;-) Cathy -- "Staccato signals of constant information..." ("The Boy in the Bubble") Paul Simon |
#379
|
|||
|
|||
"Sherry " wrote in message ... it is perfectly acceptable to use the passive voice. Has been for a few years. Sentence fragments are still no-nos, though. Psssttt.... as is ending a sentence with a preposition. Although there are ways around it, I suppose. I still remember a kid in high school who got around it by ending every sentence with "now." Of course this is the same kid who prounounced hors douvres (SP?) as "horse doovers." Have you ever read Bill Bryson, & his takes on the use of the English language? He suggests that we forget about the old dangling prepositions rule, & let them dangle all we want to. ;-) Cathy -- "Staccato signals of constant information..." ("The Boy in the Bubble") Paul Simon |
#380
|
|||
|
|||
On Tue, 13 Apr 2004 06:41:50 -0400, "Cathy Friedmann"
wrote: Have you ever read Bill Bryson, & his takes on the use of the English language? He suggests that we forget about the old dangling prepositions rule, & let them dangle all we want to. ;-) "Mother Tongue" - excellent book! Also explains how we got our crazy spelling, and has a chapter on swear words g |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|