If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#421
|
|||
|
|||
"Luvskats00" wrote in message ... Steve G: rants ..I have seen exactly zero cats squashed on the road, no-one I've direct knowledge of has had a cat either killed by predators or toxins. Indeed, there are relatively few predators and toxins lurking in wait for the cat. Steve..your (psycho) ID is appropriate. I offer info from legitimate sources (urls available on request as is the other documentations I offered time and time again) and you and the other trolls keep insisting on using your opinion as fact. Obviously, you will continue to write anything that comes to mind and pretending that is absolutely true. Sick troll. Well, hell, this post makes me feel stupid for defending you. |
#422
|
|||
|
|||
"kaeli" wrote in message ... In article , itty enlightened us with... I presume that your are debating whether or not pet cats are hit by cars. No. I am debating whether or not *you* have the right to slam another poster for letting their cats out. You don't. Everyone has the right to say what they want, even if it makes them appear like an a**hole to others or people don't like it. If I get to slam people who declaw, who am I to say it's not okay for someone else to slam people for letting their cats out? Personally, I agree that anyone who lets their cat out is the cause of the cat's death if it gets killed. I just don't say that right to people who just lost their pet. It's mean. This was essentially my point, as well as the fact that all that google detective work and responses in support of it is something icky people do in all the groups to keep out or intimidate people they don't want posting in "their group". It is a form of censorship. Every post I've seen by luvscats tonight appears to be the result of her (?) effort to be a flaming *sshole. *Shrugs* I don't know. I just hate ganging up on people. |
#423
|
|||
|
|||
"kaeli" wrote in message ... In article , itty enlightened us with... I presume that your are debating whether or not pet cats are hit by cars. No. I am debating whether or not *you* have the right to slam another poster for letting their cats out. You don't. Everyone has the right to say what they want, even if it makes them appear like an a**hole to others or people don't like it. If I get to slam people who declaw, who am I to say it's not okay for someone else to slam people for letting their cats out? Personally, I agree that anyone who lets their cat out is the cause of the cat's death if it gets killed. I just don't say that right to people who just lost their pet. It's mean. This was essentially my point, as well as the fact that all that google detective work and responses in support of it is something icky people do in all the groups to keep out or intimidate people they don't want posting in "their group". It is a form of censorship. Every post I've seen by luvscats tonight appears to be the result of her (?) effort to be a flaming *sshole. *Shrugs* I don't know. I just hate ganging up on people. |
#424
|
|||
|
|||
"kaeli" wrote in message ... In article , itty enlightened us with... I presume that your are debating whether or not pet cats are hit by cars. No. I am debating whether or not *you* have the right to slam another poster for letting their cats out. You don't. Everyone has the right to say what they want, even if it makes them appear like an a**hole to others or people don't like it. If I get to slam people who declaw, who am I to say it's not okay for someone else to slam people for letting their cats out? Personally, I agree that anyone who lets their cat out is the cause of the cat's death if it gets killed. I just don't say that right to people who just lost their pet. It's mean. This was essentially my point, as well as the fact that all that google detective work and responses in support of it is something icky people do in all the groups to keep out or intimidate people they don't want posting in "their group". It is a form of censorship. Every post I've seen by luvscats tonight appears to be the result of her (?) effort to be a flaming *sshole. *Shrugs* I don't know. I just hate ganging up on people. |
#425
|
|||
|
|||
|
#426
|
|||
|
|||
|
#427
|
|||
|
|||
|
#428
|
|||
|
|||
"Ellie Pea" wrote in message ... On 21 Nov 2003 23:26:04 GMT, (Luvskats00) wrote: Why do you consider anyone who doesn't agree with you to be a troll? This is a good question for everyone to answer who uses this term. It has essentially come to mean "anyone I disagree with" and is used to discredit others. |
#429
|
|||
|
|||
"Ellie Pea" wrote in message ... On 21 Nov 2003 23:26:04 GMT, (Luvskats00) wrote: Why do you consider anyone who doesn't agree with you to be a troll? This is a good question for everyone to answer who uses this term. It has essentially come to mean "anyone I disagree with" and is used to discredit others. |
#430
|
|||
|
|||
"Ellie Pea" wrote in message ... On 21 Nov 2003 23:26:04 GMT, (Luvskats00) wrote: Why do you consider anyone who doesn't agree with you to be a troll? This is a good question for everyone to answer who uses this term. It has essentially come to mean "anyone I disagree with" and is used to discredit others. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|