If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Did the vet screw up the FeLV test?
A few years ago, I took a few stray cats to the vet to get their
vaccinations and annual exams as I had decided to bring them in the house. I told the vet they were strays and I was going to bring them inside to live with the resident cat. I said I wanted t get them tested for FeLV and FIV so the vet did the ELISA test. The test came back negative on all the cats. Here's my problem: Prior to the test these cats had been exposed to other cats which could've been FeLV positive. They were exposed to these other cats that morning and several weeks prior to the test. By exposed I mean that they sometimes shared plates, water bowls, and litterboxes. It's my understanding (through much research) that since these cats had recently been exposed to other cats, these cats should've been quarantined for two to four weeks before being tested. Then they should've been re-tested three months later. It's possible these cats could've been infected with FeLV shortly before the test and because it was a recent infection, the tests could've come back with a false negative. Since these cats were less than a year old at the time with severe herpes infections I doubt they would've been able to fight off a FeLV infection. So, if what I'm saying is correct, it's possible these cats could have FeLV and it's possible they could've infected the resident cat. First, is all of what I just stated correct? If so, should I be upset with the vet for failing to properly inform me about FeLV and the test? And, should I/ do I have the grounds to ask or insist that these cats be retested free of charge since the first test was pointless? If these cat should be retested, which FeLV test should they get, ELISA or IFA, since it's almost two years later? Thanks in advance for any help and/or suggestions. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Did the vet screw up the FeLV test?
If you told the vet that they had been exposed very recently then he/she should have told you that you'd need to retest later. If you didn't discuss this with the vet then it's on you. Either way I can't see them retesting for nothing. - discount maybe if you had told them of your concerns and they didn't advise you to retest or isolate until it was reasonable to test. W "svu geek" wrote in message ps.com... A few years ago, I took a few stray cats to the vet to get their vaccinations and annual exams as I had decided to bring them in the house. I told the vet they were strays and I was going to bring them inside to live with the resident cat. I said I wanted t get them tested for FeLV and FIV so the vet did the ELISA test. The test came back negative on all the cats. Here's my problem: Prior to the test these cats had been exposed to other cats which could've been FeLV positive. They were exposed to these other cats that morning and several weeks prior to the test. By exposed I mean that they sometimes shared plates, water bowls, and litterboxes. It's my understanding (through much research) that since these cats had recently been exposed to other cats, these cats should've been quarantined for two to four weeks before being tested. Then they should've been re-tested three months later. It's possible these cats could've been infected with FeLV shortly before the test and because it was a recent infection, the tests could've come back with a false negative. Since these cats were less than a year old at the time with severe herpes infections I doubt they would've been able to fight off a FeLV infection. So, if what I'm saying is correct, it's possible these cats could have FeLV and it's possible they could've infected the resident cat. First, is all of what I just stated correct? If so, should I be upset with the vet for failing to properly inform me about FeLV and the test? And, should I/ do I have the grounds to ask or insist that these cats be retested free of charge since the first test was pointless? If these cat should be retested, which FeLV test should they get, ELISA or IFA, since it's almost two years later? Thanks in advance for any help and/or suggestions. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Did the vet screw up the FeLV test?
"svu geek" wrote in message ps.com... A few years ago, I took a few stray cats to the vet to get their vaccinations and annual exams as I had decided to bring them in the house. I told the vet they were strays and I was going to bring them inside to live with the resident cat. I said I wanted t get them tested for FeLV and FIV so the vet did the ELISA test. The test came back negative on all the cats. Here's my problem: Prior to the test these cats had been exposed to other cats which could've been FeLV positive. They were exposed to these other cats that morning and several weeks prior to the test. By exposed I mean that they sometimes shared plates, water bowls, and litterboxes. I don't think the vet erred. Effective transmission of FeLV requires prolonged, intimate contact or a bite wound from an infected cat. FeLV isn't as contagious as was once believed. Also, cats over 4 months old are highly resistant to FeLV infection. Since its been two years since their ELISA Snap test, you can have them retested with the IFA if you want peace of mind- although I really don't think its necessary. Best of luck, Phil |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Did the vet screw up the FeLV test?
Phil P. wrote: "svu geek" wrote in message ps.com... A few years ago, I took a few stray cats to the vet to get their vaccinations and annual exams as I had decided to bring them in the house. I told the vet they were strays and I was going to bring them inside to live with the resident cat. I said I wanted t get them tested for FeLV and FIV so the vet did the ELISA test. The test came back negative on all the cats. Here's my problem: Prior to the test these cats had been exposed to other cats which could've been FeLV positive. They were exposed to these other cats that morning and several weeks prior to the test. By exposed I mean that they sometimes shared plates, water bowls, and litterboxes. I don't think the vet erred. Effective transmission of FeLV requires prolonged, intimate contact or a bite wound from an infected cat. FeLV isn't as contagious as was once believed. Also, cats over 4 months old are highly resistant to FeLV infection. Since its been two years since their ELISA Snap test, you can have them retested with the IFA if you want peace of mind- although I really don't think its necessary. Why with the IFA instead of the ELISA? I thought the ELISA could detect FeLV in stages 2-6 and IFA in stages 5-6. So wouldn't the ELISA be better? This whole thing is very confusing. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Did the vet screw up the FeLV test?
"svu geek" wrote in message oups.com... Why with the IFA instead of the ELISA? 1. Because the IFA is more reliable for confirming persistent infections. 2. Because ELISAs have a higher incidence of false positives. 3. Because a cat will still test positive with the ELISA if she's harboring the virus in a *non-myeloid* compartment of the body. Phil |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Cat positive to Felis Leukemia test | Ronin | Cat health & behaviour | 1 | October 1st 05 11:05 AM |
Results of Bonnie's FeLV test is ... | MacCandace | Cat health & behaviour | 11 | October 5th 04 11:26 PM |
Feline Leukemia - need suggestions for postive cat living with negative cat. | Morac | Cat health & behaviour | 120 | August 26th 04 12:47 AM |
Shamrock FeLV test | Jean Hobbs | Cat anecdotes | 5 | August 15th 04 04:06 PM |